Ducatón 1618… aunque no sólo

Ducatón de 1618, primero de los ducatones emitidos a nombre de Alberto (archiduque Alberto de Austria, nieto del emperador Fernando I y gobernador de los Países Bajos) e Isabel ( Isabel Clara Eugenia, hija del Rey de España Felipe II) como consecuencia de la reforma monetaria de 1612, ducatón acuñado en el Ducado de Brabante – Amberes (mano), Bruselas (cara de ángel), Bois-le-Duc (árbol) y Maastricht (estrella)-.

http://www.coinfactswiki.com/wiki/Brabant_1618(h)_ducaton_Dav-4428

178.786 ducatones acuñados en Amberes (mano). Leones apoyados en escudo.

Année Tirage AB B TB TTB SUP SPL FDC
1618 main Atelier: Anvers
1618 téte Atelier: Bruxelles
1619 arbre Atelier Bois-le-Duc Très Rare.
1619 main Atelier: Anvers
1619 téte Atelier: Bruxelles
1620 téte Atelier: Bruxelles
1621 téte Atelier: Bruxelles

No están todos los que son…

http://www.coinfactswiki.com/wiki/Netherlands,_Spanish

Monedón de plata Ag .944, 32,48 g y diámetro: 42-43 mm

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_de_Austria

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabel_Clara_Eugenia

Este ducatón 1618 de Bruselas (cara de ángel) es raro. Leones erguidos. No he encontrado la cantidad acuñada.

https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=1020&lot=543

Cantos lisos en cospel irregular alabeado a consecuencia de la prensa.

Del ducatón de 1819 de Bois-le-Duc no he encontrado apenas información. Las acuñaciones de estos ducatones fueron, en general, descuidadas; circularon por toda Europa y, junto con los columnarios (1er lugar) y los patagones (3er lugar), me parecen las monedas acuñadas históricamente más bonitas.

https://moneditis.com/2018/12/05/efimok-ефимок-1655/

P.S.  Testing authenticity of Krugerrand coin

http://www.randrefinery.com/brochures/Testing%20the%20authenticity%20of%20a%20Krugerrand%20coin.pdf

Testing the authenticity of a Krugerrand coin

8 escudos

Repaso veraniego / Summer review / Перечитывая летом

https://moneditis.com/tag/8-escudos/

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escudo_espa%C3%B1ol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_escudo

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%8D%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BE

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%8D%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BE

20 US Dollars Saint-Gaudens 1907 double eagle XRF

(Augustus) Saint-Gaudens 20 dollars double eagle coin legend

E PLURIBUS UNUM + Stars

PM PANalytical Quantification of sample

20_dollar_1907 R.M.S.: 0.002  Normalised to: 100.0 % Sample type: Solid                                                                 Correction applied for medium: No Correction applied for film: No Results database: omnian 20                                    Results database in: c:\panalytical\superq\userdata Element Conc. (%)                                                                                                                                                                                   1 Al 0.03                                                                                                                                                                                                     2 Si 0.15                                                                                                                                                                                                       3 S 0.05                                                                                                                                                                                                       4 Cl 0.04                                                                                                                                                                                                     5 Ca 0.05                                                                                                                                                                                                   6 Fe 0.03                                                                                                                                                                                                     7 Ni 0.03                                                                                                                                                                                                     8 Cu 9.89                                                                                                                                                                                                   9 Ag 0.11                                                                                                                                                                                                     10 Hf 0.10                                                                                                                                                                                                   11 Au 89.52

Hafnio is probably a program´s error reading the XRF lines. I have not manually corrected it.

http://www.moneymuseum.com/en/coins/speaking-coins/the-saint-gaudens-coins-1908-329?slbox=true

Subastando falsas

Aquí https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&page=1

https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&lot=2395353

155 lotes

https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&lot=2395364

¡Interesante colección!

https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&lot=2395464

Con algún oro de por medio

https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&lot=2395483

ps Algunas se han quedado sin postor, pero otras… 443 libras esterlinas + comisiones

2395369l

https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?auction=2862&category=59070&lot=2395369

20 Francos Franceses Coq Marianne

20 Francos Franceses del «Gallo Marianne» 6,45 g Au .900, 21 mm diámetro y 1,3 mm de grosor

a b

Años 1904 (2), 1906, 1908 y 1913

c d

https://www.goldforex.be/servlet/javaparser?pgm=lst_or_new&lg=uk

 goldforex
1899
Tirada: 1,500,000
1900
Tirada: 615,000
 1901
Tirada: 2,643,000
1902
Tirada: 2,394,000
1903
Tirada: 4,405,000
1904
Tirada: 9,158,000
1905
Tirada: 9,158,000
1906 – Edge DIEU etc.
Tirada: 14,613,000*
1906 – Edge LIBERTE etc.
Tirada: 14,613,000*
1907
Tirada: 17,716,000
1908
Tirada: 6,721,000
1909
Tirada: 9,637,000
1910
5,779,000
1911
Tirada 5,346,000
1912
Tirada: 10,332,000
1913
Tirada: 12,163,000
1914
Tirada: 6,518,000
Grabador: Jules-Clément Chaplain
Canto Originales «Dieu Protege la France» de 1899 a 1906
Originales y Reacuñaciones 1907 a 1913 canto «Liberte Egalite Fraternite»
Reacuñaciones mas rojizas y mejor detalle de acuñación por mejores prensas – maquinaria en general en los años 50 del siglo XX
Sólo Cu+Au (rojizo) frente a Cu+Ag+Au (más amarillento – Originales)

Silver & Gold

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-31/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-silver

Economic wars and hot military wars increase debt and commodity prices. Gold and silver will see another rally, probably one that surprises almost everyone.

http://hide-it.net/index.php/component/virtuemart/view/category/virtuemart_category_id/48

Gold vs Grandma

Let me start with a observation, that while obvious, is seldom mentioned – An ounce of gold purchased in 1990 is today worth exactly, an ounce of gold, while a dollar saved in 1990 is today worth about 33 cents.  In early 1990 a barrel of oil cost $21 dollars (19 barrels for 1 ounce of Gold) – today a barrel of oil costs $60 dollars (20 barrels for 1 ounce of Gold). Even diehard believers talk about Gold’s value in Dollars – It’s going to $3000.00 they proclaim. That would probably only mean that the Dollar has fallen against other currencies.Would it not be better to see an ounce of Gold go to 60 barrels of Oil?

 All these prognostications one sees about Gold going to $5000.00 and beyond are actually propaganda for the Dollar. The implication is that Gold is just a vehicle to obtain more Dollars and if it did go to $5000.00 you would sell it and declare victory. Gold could go to $5000.00 USD and still only be worth 20 Barrels of oil.

 We only judge currencies against one another – like kids in the tub comparing rubber duckies bobbing up and down while ignoring the declining water level. Meanwhile, central planning has pulled the drain plug and added more bubble bath. Not to worry were told, the water isn’t going down – the tub is getting bigger.

 There are many good charts on the oil – gold ratio, what I cannot find is a Global Gold index. A real barometer of what Gold is worth in paper currencies on a truly global basis. It would illustrate that Gold’s exchange rate against paper is far more stable than it appears when compared to the U.S. Dollar or any single currency.

 Consider the last twelve months (March 2014 through March 2015). The US Dollar Index has gone from 80 to 100 – a 25% move, while in the same period Gold in Dollars went from $1310 to $1200, an 8% move. Meanwhile over the same time span, Gold in Swiss Franc’s declined only 0.55%, and in the Singapore Dollar and the Argentinean peso it moved even less while in the Euro it went up 6% from €940 to €1100 euro. So what did Gold really do against global paper in the last year? As best I can surmise, gold actually went nowhere against paper. Better stated, paper went nowhere against Gold.

 A global valuation will become more important as the so called «competitive devaluations» accelerate. Call me suspicious, but they appear very coordinated to be competitive, maybe it is just a coincident that they take turns with Q.E. If they are indeed taking turns it would appear the Fed is up next. Orchestrated global gyrations require a better valuation method, at least until we arrive at the mother of all debasements – Maximus Printus – Global Q.E.

 If nothing else a Global Gold Index would provide spine stiffening support for those valiant souls still holding leveraged gold positions. Many of us have no parachute.

 UBS believes something is coming down the pike – they just raised margin requirements on Gold by 25%. The last time they raised margins the Swiss Franc peg was cancelled. Mish has an interesting story about UBS predicting more Q.E.

 Here at Hide-It we also believe something is coming down the pike. Not sure what it is, but it appears to be disguised as a tiny grandma – traveling with a boatload of rubber duckies. Let’s hope she’s got enough bubble bath.

 Have no fear, Grandma’s here.

Buy it. Hide it. Wait.

Un poco más de lo mismo. A veces el sentimiento contrario ayuda 🙂

1851 50 US dollars California oktogonal

84,73 g. Au .887 Assayer: Augustus Humbert. San Francisco. Gold Rush

123

Nice and rare freemasonry? 50 $ coin

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot/1851-augustus-humbert-us-1958429-details.aspx?intObjectID=1958429

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot/1852-united-states-assay-1958435-details.aspx?pos=8&intObjectID=1958435&sid=&page=12&lid=1

Die notes: Octagonal format. Obverse with central motif of eagle perched on a rock, holding a shield, and in its beak a long ribbon inscribed LIBERTY. Above, a label or cartouche on which the fineness was stamped. Surrounding: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and below, D and C, to be stamped for values in dollars and, if applicable, cents (none are known with a cents imprint). Reverse with engine-turned design. Edge lettered: AUGUSTUS HUMBERT UNITED STATES ASSAYER OF GOLD CALIFORNIA 1851. Die state: Perfect dies. PCGS Data: The single finest of three examples from the S.S. Central America treasure certified by PCGS.The Humbert $50 «Slugs» In California in 1849 and early 1850, monetary matters were in a state of flux. Many different private issues-coins and ingots-had appeared under the imprints of Kohler; Norris, Gregg & Norris; Bowie; the Miners Bank; Baldwin & Co.; Moffat; and others. Some of these had intrinsic or melt-down values close to their stated face values, while others did not. Seeking to add stability to circulating gold coins, in September 1850 Congress authorized the secretary of the Treasury to contract with a well-established assaying business in California to affix the stamp of the United States to bars and ingots, to assay gold, and assign value to it. Moffat & Co., the most respected of the San Francisco coiners, and probably the one with the best «connections,» received the commission. Appointed to the position of United States assayer was Augustus Humbert, a New York City maker of watch cases, who arrived in San Francisco on January 8, 1851. Meanwhile, in preparation for the new franchise, in late 1850, Moffat & Co. curtailed most of their private business and prepared to issue coins under the government contract. New premises were secured on Montgomery Street between Clay & Commercial streets. While Moffat was preparing for issuing coins under the federal franchise, it issued no coins under its own imprint. The gap was filled with alacrity and enthusiasm by Dubosq, Baldwin, and Schultz-earlier discussed in the present catalogue. Not long thereafter, Moffat vanquished its competitors via James King of Wm. and the resultant smear campaign-also related earlier.$50 Slugs MintedThe production of federal coins, determined to be of $50 denomination, promised great profits for Moffat & Co. in early 1851. On February 14, San Francisco Prices Current contained an article relating to the $50 slugs, indicating their regular production was about to begin: «The above cut represents the obverse of the United States ingot, or, rather, coin, of the value of $50, about to be issued at the Government Assay Office. It is precisely of this size and shape…. The reverse side bears an impression of rayed work without any inscription. Upon the edges following: ‘Augustus Humbert United States Assayer-California Gold 1851.’… The fifty-dollar pieces will be of uniform value, and will be manufactured in the same manner as coins…. By order of the secretary of the Treasury these ingots and coin are to be received for duties and other dues to the United States government, and our bankers, we are advised, will receive them at their stamped value. This will produce an important change in the monetary affairs here, gold dust will immediately go up, and as a necessary consequence foreign and domestic [Eastern] exchange will be at a premium 5 to 7…» The Alta California commented on the new $50 pieces on February 21, 1851: «The new 50-dollar gold piece…was issued by Moffat & Co. yesterday. About three hundred of these pieces have already been struck off…. The coin is peculiar, containing only one face, and the eagle in the center, around which are the words ‘UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.’ Just over the eagle is stamped «887 THOUS.» signifying the fineness of the gold. At the bottom is stamped ’50 DOLLS.’ The other face is ornamented with a kind of work technically called engine-turning, being a number of radii extending from the common centre, in which is stamped, in small figures, ’50.’ Around the edge is stamped the name of the United States Assayer….» At the time, some of the pieces were inscribed 880 THOUS., while a few others were noted as 887 THOUS. (per the above newspaper account). Later varieties of $50 issues had the denomination marked «FIFTY DOLLS» and as part of the die inscription. These seem to have replaced the very early issues (such as the S.S. Central America coin offered in this lot) which had the value and fineness individually hand punched. From the preceding, it seems reasonable to conclude that the coin here offered was part of the group released on February 20, 1851, and that later pieces were all of the «DOLLS» type. In the first quarter of 1851 the Moffat-Humbert coiners produced $530,000 worth of pieces. This is equal to 10,600 $50 pieces. It further seems reasonable to assume that only a few of the style with the «50» value, «880» or «887» fineness, and eight edge segments hand stamped were made, and that late February and all March pieces were of the type with the value and fineness in the die and with reeded edge.Steps in Minting an 1851 $50Lettered Edge Type The large and impressive lettered edge $50 coins made in February 1851 were created by a very complicated process involving the following separate steps once the planchet was produced, quite possibly the most complex set of minting steps for any coin ever authorized by the American government (or any other kind of coin of which we are aware). Step 1. The obverse and reverse motifs were stamped from a pair of dies. These dies had been made in New York City by Humbert and brought with him to California. The obverse features an eagle holding a shield, perched on a rock, with a thin ribbon inscribed LIBERTY in its beak. Above is a blank ribbon suitable for inscription. The dies of this style were the work of Charles Cushing Wright. One pattern impression in copper is signed on the edge by Wright as «Wright fec,» for «Wright fecit» (Latin for «Wright made it»). Inscriptions on these patterns as well as the first octagonal ingots produced for circulation have simply the letters D C DWT. GRS. It was intended that the value in dollars and cents and the weight in pennyweights and grains could simply be stamped in the place provided. In this way ingots of $50, $100, $200, or any other desired denomination could be produced, differing from each other only by size, weight, and fineness, but incorporating the same stamp. · The reverse is of a geometric «engine turned» design similar to that used on a watch case, and reflects Augustus Humbert’s skill as a maker of such cases-one of the occupations he had followed in New York City. Steps 2-4. The fineness was hand-stamped on the obverse with three separate numeral punches. Finenesses known to have been thus applied include 880 (as usually seen) and 887. Steps 5-6. The value (50) was hand-stamped on the obverse, from two single punches. Steps 7-14. In eight separate operations each of the eight edge faces was stamped with a logotype punch, the eight punches reading incuse: AUGUSTUS HUMBERT UNITED STATES ASSAYER OF GOLD CALIFORNIA 1851. There was no particular starting or stopping place for the inscriptions, and the position of a given part of the inscription varies with relation to its position to design elements. The several specimens of this variety examined by the writer (QDB) in recent months as part of a numismatic study have each had the lettering inverted in relation to the obverse (this being true of the presently offered S.S. Central America example as well). Thus, it took at least 14 steps to create one of the early $50 pieces. Later coins with the fineness and value in the die and with reeded edge were struck in a single operation. Some had the denomination 50 stamped at the center of the reverse, an additional procedure.Additional Notes While the federal standard for gold coinage was 900 1000 fine, in San Francisco in 1851 this was difficult to attain with the refining processes then in use, and the Humbert coinage was of two finenesses, 800 and 887, the latter coins being slightly lighter in overall weight due to the smaller proportion of alloy. By 1852, coins of 900 fineness were being made, but other finenesses (884 and 887) were employed as well. The remaining alloy was native silver (whereas under the government standard, copper was used). Although the Humbert $50 pieces were clearly produced under government auspices, and although they were receivable for U.S. customs payments in San Francisco, in Philadelphia on April 23, 1851, Mint Director George N. Eckert perversely (it would seem) stated that while Augustus Humbert was the United States Assayer in California, his stamping of bars for owners of bullion did not make them legal tender.$50 Gold: Massett Writes Steven C. Massett, accomplished entertainer and co-owner and co-editor of the Marysville Herald, was in San Francisco on May 3, 1851 to give a concert. He later recalled what happened, this being the time of the great fire: «At the time T. Butler King, Esq., was collector of the port, and running for U.S. senator. Our paper supported his election, and the consequence was that a very ‘fat’ advertisement fell to the lot of the proprietors of the Marysville Herald, to the tune of $1,800, which amount was duly handed to me in octagonal fifty-dollar gold pieces, and which was lodged for safekeeping at the banking house of Burgoyne & Co., at the corner of Montgomery and Washington streets. «The deposit was made the day after my concert had taken place. Consequently I have about $2,500 ‘on call’ there at the time. «I was standing at the top of Clay Street, near Pike, when the fire was raging at its height. Block after block of buildings were caught in the fiery embrace. Union Hotel, [Jenny Lind] Theatre, El Dorado building-all were swept away, and at last the flames caught the Bank of Burgoyne & Co., whose building was considered fireproof. It was seemingly enclosed in sheets of flame, and many a heart quailed in expectation of losing every cent there deposited, for the heaviest accounts in the city were kept at this pet banking establishment. If my friend J.R.C. ever reads these lines, he will recollect the query I put to him, as to whether he though the place would stand! «On that night everybody slept in the open air, on the top of barrels, bales, or anything else-there did not seem to be the vestige of a house left. Utter desolation and despair reigned supreme. «About 10 o’clock on the following morning, George Plume, one of the firm, upon going to the safe (one of the celebrated Herring’s by the way) handed me my buckskin bag of gold, with even the sealing wax not melted! «So much for a good safe, and my luck!»